The time, form and content of the speeches of the representatives of this party's congressmen are very interesting. Each party has five minutes for presentations, followed by discussion. Surprisingly, except for one of the nine political parties from left to right, all eight parties said: we agree that this issue is very important and will be included in the water law in the next session. The discussion of the amendment and so on, very consistent statement.
Judging from taiwan's experience in dealing with environmental ghost mannequin effect service issues, this scene can be said to be a bit too harmonious, but discussing the reasons can probably be attributed to two reasons: first, finnish society has actually been talking about this issue for a long time. This stakeholder-oriented symposium on migratory fish has been held for the third time, in addition to the already-enforced water law that has long incorporated protection measures for river fish. The second reason may be because the biggest opponent of this issue, the representatives of hydropower plants actually did not attend much and did not report on stage. But I think the interlude of this seminar reflects this seminar based on the subject of dialogue.
A member of congress: "...(some words that positively agree with the importance of this issue)... But I think all relevant groups should be brought in, such as fishermen, representatives of hydroelectric power plants, etc., and should not be absent." chairman: "We also wanted to come to them, but the hydroelectric power plant didn't seem to be interested. When we invited the hydroelectric power plant for the second time, they refused immediately! Immediately! So we didn't send them an invitation letter this time. ”